{"id":90012,"date":"2025-11-27T05:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-11-27T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bloomministries.org\/faith\/?p=90012"},"modified":"2026-09-10T12:58:02","modified_gmt":"2026-09-10T19:58:02","slug":"i-will-hear-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bloomministries.org\/faith\/i-will-hear-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Daily Offering: November 27, 2025 | I Will Hear You"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Opening Address<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bloom’s Daily Offering<\/strong> for Thursday, and the entrance chant this morning says you shall call upon me, and I will hear you<\/em>. That is the whole promise, handed over at the door, with nothing attached to it and no conditions on the front. Today is a fourth-class feria in green: no saint, no feast, no commemoration, and three days left in the Church’s year. Beloved, grace and peace to you, wherever this finds you and whatever kind of Thursday it is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is the unusual part, and it is worth having straight before we start. Every single text of this Mass belongs to Sunday. The chant, the prayer, the Lesson, the psalm, the Gospel, the Secret: ten propers on Sunday and the same ten today, on a day the calendar has given no occasion to at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So the Church is saying the same thing again, out loud, into a Thursday. Nobody moved it here because the reading suited the day. There is no anniversary in it, no procession, no colour change, nothing to mark. I will hear you<\/strong>, said twice inside one week, the second time to a much smaller room.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You do not need to believe any of this for the next quarter of an hour to be worth your time. If you have ever been told that a prayer of yours failed because of the way you made it, today’s texts are about you, and the theology comes off cleanly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Word on Today’s Propers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Today is a genuine repeat, and it is worth saying so plainly at the top.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Mass of this Thursday is the Mass of my words shall not pass<\/a>, offered here on Sunday the twenty-third: the same Introit, the same Collect, the same Lesson from Colossians, the same Gradual, the same Gospel from Matthew, the same Secret. The readings are therefore not reprinted below<\/strong>. Their citations are given and linked, and Sunday’s offering carries them in full.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Two things did move, and both are small. The Preface today is the Common one, where Sunday’s was the Preface of the Most Holy Trinity. And the Alleluia is not sung: its verse from the hundred and twenty-ninth psalm stands inside the Gradual instead, with the alleluias taken off it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is the entire difference between Sunday and Thursday. The clause I will hear you<\/em> is identical on both, and so is everything standing on either side of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Introit<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

(Jeremias 29:11-12; 29:14; Ps. 84:2)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(The antiphon is the Missal’s own arrangement, drawn from three places in the twenty-ninth chapter of Jeremias and joined into a single sentence. It has now opened three Masses in eleven days, having been sung on the sixteenth of this month as well.)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The Lord saith: I think thoughts of peace, and not of affliction<\/a>: you shall call upon me, and I will hear you; and I will bring back your captivity from all places.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\u2123. Lord, thou hast blessed thy land: thou hast turned away the captivity of Jacob. Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the chant that opened the Mass we called thoughts of peace<\/a> on the sixteenth, and Sunday’s again on the twenty-third. Three times in eleven days, and the middle clause has not once been softened.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Collect<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Stir up, we beseech Thee, O Lord, the wills of Thy faithful people: that, seeking more earnestly the fruit of Thy divine work, they may receive more abundantly the healing effects of Thy goodness. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Read who is being asked to do what. The wills belong to the faithful people and the stirring is asked of God, which is the same shape we prayed on the eleventh, when we said we had no power of our own<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Epistle<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

(Colossians 1:9-14<\/a>, Douay-Rheims)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Today’s Lesson is Sunday’s Lesson entire, and is not reprinted here. It is printed in full, with the note on its opening clause, in the offering for November 23.)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gradual<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

(Ps. 43:8-9, with the verse of Ps. 129:1-2; the address “O Lord” belongs to the Missal’s arrangement rather than to either verse)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Thou hast saved us, O Lord, from them that afflict us<\/a>: and hast put them to shame that hate us.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\u2123. In God shall we glory all the day long: and in thy name we will give praise for ever.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2123. Out of the depths<\/a> I have cried to thee, O Lord: Lord, hear my voice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Gospel<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

(Matthew 24:15-35<\/a>, Douay-Rheims)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

(Today’s Gospel is Sunday’s Gospel entire, twenty-one verses, and is not reprinted here. It is printed in full in the offering for November 23.)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Offering<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A Thursday in late November with no feast on it is about as little as a day can be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fourth class is the bottom of the ranking. There is no saint to keep, no colour to change into, nothing being commemorated, nothing being kept up. And into that, the Church puts the sentence you shall call upon me, and I will hear you<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I will hear you.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is the same sentence it used on Sunday, when the room was full and the year was ending and the reading was twenty-one verses about the sky coming apart. Nothing about it has been scaled down for a weekday. It arrives at the same size it arrived at on Sunday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The day with nothing attached to it<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Start with what today is not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is not an anniversary. It is not the eve of anything, it commemorates nobody, and no part of it exists because something once happened on the twenty-seventh of November. The calendar has handed this Thursday no reason at all, and the Mass goes ahead in the same words. What it says into the day is I will hear you<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is a plainer claim than it looks. Most of what we are taught to think of as serious happens on marked days, and most of us have absorbed the arithmetic without ever being taught it directly: that the big occasions are where the real business is done, and the rest is filler in between. The Church’s own practice says otherwise on every weekday it has, without ever arguing about it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There are three days left in this year of the Church, and the Missal has spent none of them on a summary. Sunday is Advent and everything changes\u2014violet, a new beginning, a first-class day. Today is not a run-up to that and is not treated as one. It is a Thursday, and the promise in it is I will hear you<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The same holds with no God in it at all. What a person is actually like shows up in what they do on the days when there is no reason to do it, and that is as true of institutions as of people. A thing said only at ceremonies is a ceremony, and a thing said on a wet Thursday to four people is a position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The same sentence, said again<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Now the repetition, because it is the substance of the day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My words shall not pass<\/a> was Sunday, and every proper of it is here again this morning. Not a summary of it. Not a shortened version for a weekday. The whole Mass, with the Preface swapped and the alleluias taken off, and I will hear you<\/em> said over it a second time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One reading of that is thinness, as though the Church had run out of material and was going round again. It is worth setting against the alternative, which was available and was not taken. The Missal could have given this Thursday a smaller entrance chant and a briefer prayer, on the reasonable ground that fewer people would be there to hear it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead the arrangement is the reverse of economy. Twenty-one verses of Gospel get read again into a nearly empty room, and the chant that carries I will hear you<\/em> is sung a third time in eleven days.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the fifteenth we sat with an instruction to preach the word in season and out of season<\/a>, and this is that instruction carried out on the Church’s own calendar rather than argued about in a letter. In season was Sunday. Out of season is now, and the text has not been adjusted for the change of audience. I will hear you<\/em>, to whoever came.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The one line that goes the other way<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

There is a single line in this Mass that travels upward instead of down, and it is worth stopping on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Gradual ends with a verse from the hundred and twenty-ninth psalm: Out of the depths I have cried to thee, O Lord: Lord, hear my voice.<\/em> Everything else this morning is God speaking or the Church speaking about God. This is the one place where the person in the pew is given the words, and it is the half that gets answered by I will hear you<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Look at what it does not do. It does not say out of the depths, having first got myself into some sort of order, I have cried to thee<\/em>. It states the position the call is being made from and then makes the call anyway, and the depth is reported as a location rather than confessed as a fault. Nothing has to be true of you first for I will hear you<\/em> to be the reply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So the two halves of the morning fit together without anybody having to arrange them. From below, a cry with no qualifying clause. From above, a promise with no qualifying clause. The Church put those two sentences in the same twenty minutes and left both of them bare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What the promise leaves out<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Here is the clause itself, and the thing to look at is what is missing from it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You shall call upon me, and I will hear you.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I will hear you.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is no adverb. It does not say and I will hear you if you ask properly<\/em>, or if you have asked often enough<\/em>, or if you are in a fit state when you ask<\/em>. It does not grade the asking, and it does not make the hearing depend on the quality of the call. Four words with no machinery behind them: I will hear you<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That absence is doing real work, because almost every version of this promise a person meets in ordinary religious life has a condition bolted onto it. Ask in faith. Ask without doubting. Get right first, then ask.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The clause as the Church actually sings it has none of that. This morning it is sung to a room that had no particular reason to be assembled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Collect makes the same move from the other end, and it is easy to miss because of one word. It asks that we might seek more earnestly<\/em>, which sounds at first as though the earnestness is the thing we are meant to supply. Read the grammar again, because it settles the matter: the prayer asks God<\/strong> to stir up the wills. The earnestness is what is being requested, not what is being required as the entry fee, and I will hear you<\/em> is what stands over the request.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So the day’s two prayers agree. The hearing is not graded, and the willingness to ask is itself something asked for on our behalf. If you have gone flat, this Mass does not treat you as a defaulter; it treats you as somebody whose will needs stirring, and it asks somebody other than you to do the stirring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What gets taught about being heard<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

So to the harm, which both of today’s prayers have already taken apart between them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A teaching goes round, rarely said in those words and constantly implied, that being heard is earned by the quality of the asking. Its practical form is a diagnosis: if nothing has shifted, look at how you prayed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You did not mean it enough. You held something back. You asked and then took it away again, so the asking did not count. Set that against the four words the Church actually sings: I will hear you<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am naming who this lands on hardest. People in recovery from addiction, who are told, at the point of maximum shame, that a relapse is evidence the surrender was never real and that the prayer therefore never landed. It is a very tidy piece of reasoning and it cannot lose, because every outcome confirms it. What the Church sings at the door of this Mass is I will hear you<\/em>, with no such clause anywhere in it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I will hear you.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Run the fruit test where it is ours to run, on the record of our own faith, and say what the teaching grows. It grows people who stop asking, because a request that will be graded is a request that can be failed, and somebody already carrying that much shame has no appetite for another examination. It grows the belief that the craving is a verdict on the asking. And it grows silence at exactly the hour when a person most needs to say something out loud to somebody, which is the one hour I will hear you<\/em> was put there for.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

None of that is in the entrance chant. The clause has no test in it, and the Collect asks God to supply the very willingness the teaching demands the person produce unaided. That is not a soft reading of either prayer; it is the plain grammar of both.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The limits of that claim matter, because a vague version of it would do damage of its own. Nothing here says a relapse did not matter, or that what somebody is doing to stay well is optional, or that the wanting stops. I am not going to tell you that the asking makes the craving lift, and this offering has no view on what anybody ought to do next about it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What the Mass says, and the whole of what it says, is that the line is not cut at the moment you would most expect it to be cut, and I will hear you<\/em> is the form the Church gives that in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the ninth of this month we sat with a man who could not for the crowd<\/a> get anywhere near Christ, and the difference between that day and today is worth stating. That day was about whether you can reach him at all. Today is about whether, having got a few words out, they register on arrival, or whether they are marked first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A lectern, and four chairs<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

There is a story sometimes told of a woman of seventy-one who has read the lesson at the half past nine Mass on a Thursday morning for nineteen years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is in a side chapel off the main body of a town church, plain glass, stone floor, four wooden chairs in a short row and rarely more than eleven people. She is asked out loud every week by whoever is sacristan, she walks up in front of everybody, she reads at a lectern where every person in the room can see her, and she sits down again. There is nothing furtive about any of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What there is nothing of is occasion. No Thursday in those nineteen years was ever a feast that needed her. Nobody built a rota round her, no anniversary of the arrangement has ever been marked, and she has never once been asked to do a Sunday, which in that church is where a reader gets put when somebody has plans for them. The Thursday keeps handing her I will hear you<\/em> anyway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

She has said that the year her husband was ill she read badly for about eight months and knew it\u2014losing her place, going too fast, once stopping in the middle of a sentence for long enough that a man in the second row said the next word for her. She kept the Thursday, and nobody discussed it with her. She has also said, without any drama attached to it at all, that she has asked for the same thing at the same point in that Mass since 2011 and has had no answer she could point to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That is the whole of it, and I will hear you<\/em> is the only claim this morning makes about it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am not going to tell you it resolved. She still has no answer she could point to, the numbers in the side chapel have gone down rather than up across the nineteen years, and the parish has twice considered dropping the Thursday altogether. Nothing in this story gets fixed. What she has is a day with nothing attached to it and a sentence she keeps saying into it, out loud, in front of people. Nineteen years of I will hear you<\/em>, on the day nobody scheduled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where this leaves us<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

So here is what I would ask you to carry out of an ordinary Thursday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the last thing you said to God was said badly, or drunk, or furious, or in eleven words on a stairwell, the Church’s own entrance chant this morning attaches no rider to it. The clause is you shall call upon me, and I will hear you<\/em>, and the Church chose to sing it on a day it had given no occasion to.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I will hear you.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

And if you believe none of it, the same shape survives the removal. A promise with conditions attached is a transaction, and a transaction can be failed by the person who most needs it to work. A promise with no conditions attached is a different object, and the honest way to test which kind you have been handed is to see what happens when you turn up in poor condition on a day when nothing is going on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I will hear you.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sunday had everything. It had the last Sunday of the year, the Gloria, the Creed, a full room and a Gospel about the sky coming apart. Today has a green vestment, four chairs and no reason at all, and the promise in the doorway has not changed by one word. I will hear you<\/em>, both times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Call, and be heard, because I will hear you<\/em> is the sentence this day was given to carry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Secret<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n

Be merciful, O Lord, to our humble requests, and accept the offerings and prayers of Thy people: turn the hearts of us all unto Thee, that, freed from earthly craving, we may pass over to heavenly longing. Through our Lord Jesus Christ.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The Holding<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

May what you said this morning be taken exactly as it came out of you, uncorrected, unranked, and not sent back for a second attempt. May the willingness you cannot manufacture be stirred up in you from somewhere other than your own effort. And may the ordinary days, which are nearly all of them, be the ones you are held through. I will hear you<\/em>, on a Thursday, with nothing else going on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And if none of that is yours to say, take it in plainer form. What you asked for counts as having been asked, however badly it came out, and you are not required to produce the right state of mind before you are allowed to want something. The days with nothing on them are still your days, and I will hear you<\/em> is not a sentence that checks the calendar first. You are allowed to be helped on one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Go, and call from wherever you are standing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n